🔗 Share this article

This latest work centers on protagonists chasing after new beginnings, attempting to leave behind substance abuse or abusive marriages, only to see hope turn into conflict. Kraus frequently uses the phrase "fresh start", making it intentionally weary through its repetitions. Phrases such as "He was ready for a new beginning" and "They opted for a clean break" appear throughout the narrative. Meanwhile, she appears to be undertaking her personal new beginning, as this presents as a novel form of writing – fact-based, genuinely novelistic. However it proves to be laden with the familiar conflicts and approaches as her previous works.

From Accidental Writer to Renowned Book

The writer was originally an artist who entered the literary world almost accidentally with her 1997 seminal work I Love Dick, made up of letters to an unreceptive lover, elevating confessional female writing from self-debasement into rebellion. She kept producing books, but the following three fascinating and rebarbative novels lacked the shock and immediacy that the letter form imparted to the tone of I Love Dick. It didn't help was her role as a nonconformist creator who had turned into a major property owner, so there was significant attention on real estate deals. It follows that she now wants to experiment with fresh narrative sources, turning outward to the experiences of others, at a period in which she claims that contemporary political climate turns intimate literature obsolete.

Multiple Generations, One Unescapable Past

The Four Spent the Day Together is structured in three parts, encompassing multiple eras – all unable to escape their backgrounds. There is the tale of Emma and Jasper, based on the author's parents, transitioning from the urban environment to a pastoral setting. Then there is the account of Kraus, in the character of protagonist Catt Greene, confronting the delayed acclaim of I Love Dick, the emergence of Trump, and her substance-dependent spouse Paul. And there is the story of the murder of one directionless individual by another in a town long abandoned by progressive politics only 80 miles from the protagonist's home in a remote part of Minnesota.

As a reader attracted to honed writing of the kind Kraus herself often avoids, I was enchanted by the novelistic voice of the opening part.

As a reader drawn to precise prose of the style that the author often disregards, I was captivated by the storytelling approach of the first section. There is a novel degree of detail that makes room for trivial aspects, like the pail that the youthful Catt frees from the ice at the start of the story, aided by her beloved father. "I found an ice toy!" she declares; "a nice toy", he answers, "the ambiguous meanings of language tumbling in their mouths like piece candy". Kraus writes Emma's narrative with interest and closeness. "It seemed to Emma she had entered a dream – not hers, exactly."

Frustration and Disruption

I was bound to become frustrated when I expected this fresh tone could continue through the novel. Kraus says here that she is annoyed by the satisfaction readers like me have gotten from I Love Dick; she's devoted to fragmentation, to the messy artistic approach she has in common with her hero Kathy Acker, and the emptiness and redundancy of her past books comes back in the central part. The protagonist is working on refurbishing multiple decrepit residences in the city's most challenging districts while moving between two different states, unsuccessful in assisting her husband curb his addiction. She is overwhelmed as Paul transitions between underfunded jobs as an substance abuse counselor in a society driven by the hostility and dread that powers an electoral success. A significant portion discusses about the protagonist facing cancellation on Twitter, her occupation changed from "novelist" to "property owner" on a reference site. The author still appears to be overly concerned about this. In a moment she remarks that she's investigating the murder so that before departing the state, "she could potentially understand something about an the nation that her social media opponents would not understand, would not even see".

The Murder Narrative

Then we reach to the murder itself – and the eponymous day passed by the murdered individual with the perpetrator and his companions. Kraus has great source material, and knows hour by hour what happened when Brandon came to meet Brittney after meeting her on an app where she sold sex pictures. He was hoping for sex but seems amiably to have occupied the day with her companions, mooching around having his vehicle repaired and funding treats and narcotics, before being shot by Brittney's partner a man named Micah – a individual with mental health challenges who has repeatedly received inpatient care for fits of anger.

Preoccupation and Open Ends

Catt develops an obsession by the story, and I was fascinated by the way that her twin drives towards accurate chronicling and daring boundary-pushing clash in this segment. Yet I wished her to go further into her individual preoccupations here. The compelling persona is Brittney herself, who becomes vivid partially because of Catt's identification with her – another bright, bullied girl spiraling out of control in a struggling, neglected community. Kraus tells us that Catt speaks to Brittney in prison, but she fails to enact these dialogues. This entire part feels curiously unresolved, to the degree that Kraus's narration ends almost mid-par