🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat say that indecision over how to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue details a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They intended this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.